AVA Main Directory | Resource Links | Event Calendar | Vampirism Research Study | Archived AVA Forum v1.0

Atlanta Vampire Alliance [AVA]
User Info
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 17, 2021, 10:23:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search

Key Stats
19898 Posts in 2604 Topics by 1004 Members
Latest Member: DragonBLood
Home Help Arcade Login Register
Atlanta Vampire Alliance [AVA]  |  Religion, Spirituality, & Philosophy  |  Christianity | Christian Mysticism | Enochian | Gnosticism | Hermeticism (Moderators: Merticus, SoulSplat, Eclecta, Maloryn, Zero)  |  03.16.10 - Battling The Antichrist By Outlawing Microchips - Religion Dispatches 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 03.16.10 - Battling The Antichrist By Outlawing Microchips - Religion Dispatches  (Read 6241 times)
House AVA Founder
Level 5 Contributor
Gender: Male
Posts: 1651

« on: March 16, 2010, 04:38:10 PM »


Battling The Antichrist By Outlawing Microchips
By Joseph Laycock
March 16, 2010

We can rest easy, knowing that our government wants us to be safe from forced implantation of microchips. But it's not about civil liberties, it's about dispensational paranoia and fear of the “Mark of the Beast.”

Last month, Virginia lawmaker Mark Cole, a Fredericksburg Republican, sponsored a bill in the House of Delegates to prohibit the involuntary implantation of microchips into human beings. “My understanding—I’m not a theologian—but there’s a prophecy in the Bible that says you’ll have to receive a mark, or you can neither buy nor sell things in end times,” said Cole. “Some people think these computer chips might be that mark.”

In spite of some ridicule, Cole’s bill passed the Virginia House of Delegates by an overwhelming 88-9 majority—because, as his fellow Republican David B. Albo opined, “The fact that some people who support it are a little wacky doesn’t make it a bad idea.”

Cole is not alone among state legislators nationwide. Wisconsin, California, and North Dakota have already passed legislation to protect their citizens from unwanted subdermal implants. A similar bill has just passed the house in Tennessee. The Georgia State Senate also passed an anti-microchip bill last month, sponsored by two Chips: Republican State Senators Chip Pearson and Chip Rogers, both Baptists and active in their churches.

Beast 2.0

The sponsors of these bills, all of them Republicans and outspoken conservative Christians, claim that preventing the forced implantation of microchips is a civil rights issue: they seek to protect citizens from unwanted bodily intrusions by employers and especially what they depict as a big brother-esque government. Yet the technology to embed radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips into animals and people has existed since the early nineties, and so far no one has attempted a forced implantation of the populace.

There are, of course, purely secular reasons against forced implantation of RFID chips and in favor of policies that particularly protect the truly vulnerable. But the true impetus behind these laws (give Cole points for honesty here) appears to lie squarely in Christian dispensationalism and speculation about “the mark of the beast” described in the Book of Revelation.

Conjecture about the mark of the beast has evolved alongside technology for at least the last forty years, merging with Orwellian concerns about how new technologies can enhance the power of the state. Of all innovations, those dealing with information and communication have held a special appeal for dispensationalist theories.

According to Robert C. Fuller in Naming the Antichrist, the Southwest Radio Church warned as early as 1975 that “The Beast” was the name of a supercomputer created to control the global economy. That same year, Christian dispensationalist Colin Deal expressed a similar theory, warning that “The Beast” could assign everyone on Earth an invisible “laser tattoo.” Similar technological suspicions were expressed by Emil Gaverluk and Patrick Fisher in Fiber Optics: The Eye of the Anti-Christ (1979) and David Webber and Noah Hutchings in Computers and the Beast of Revelation (1986).

The Mark of Paranoia

The first person to suggest that the mark of the beast could be a microchip may have been Peter Lalonde in his One World Under Anti-Christ (1991). However, the association of microchip technology with the mark of the beast was thoroughly hammered into the American consciousness by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins’ bestselling Left Behind Series. The eighth installment of the series, The Mark (2000), describes how the Antichrist’s new world order will require everyone to be implanted with a microchip or be guillotined by a “loyalty enforcement facilitator.” The Mark sold over three million copies by 2004.

That same year, the FDA approved the VeriChip, an RFID chip that can be implanted under the skin into human beings, marking them with personal data that can be read through a scanner. The VeriChip Corporation, now part of the company PositiveID, has suggested that this technology could have useful applications such as storing a patient’s medical data and—in apparent confirmation of apocalyptic anxieties—commerce. A VIP club in Barcelona has allowed customers to use Verichips as debit cards. “Marked” beachgoers can leave their wallets at home and simply have their arm scanned to purchase a drink.

The appeal of anti-microchip legislation is part of a larger narrative that equates “the beast” with foreign interests acting through the federal government; a theme that plays well in a political climate marked by populist anger and millenialist paranoia. Advocating laws because they will hinder the actions of the Antichrist, as preposterous as it seems, is made possible by a highly-politicized American subculture that has been profoundly influenced by the dispensationalist imagination. It is not an accident that the sponsors of anti-microchip legislation have admitted their concern about the mark of the beast. By making clear that their concerns are not purely secular, these legislators are able to build support from an energized evangelical base. Opponents can mock these politicians as paranoiacs, but among voters who have read The Mark, concern about the Antichrist is a political asset, not a liability.

Etheros Twilight
Level 5 Contributor
Gender: Male
Posts: 454

« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2010, 09:49:24 PM »

This is old news....The History Channel talked about the microchip connection to the antichrist way back when they first aired their special on the antichrist.....


semper praecidium nox quod vitae noctum est omnes nosferatem vitae
Level 5 Contributor
Gender: Male
Posts: 468

« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2010, 01:44:24 PM »

Wow really, im suprised i have never heard of this.

Everyone has their own perception of perfection.

Ridentem dicere verum quid vetat.

Meja yht mad meja.
Level 2 Contributor
Gender: Female
Posts: 16

Ná bíodh eagla an dorchadas.

« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2010, 03:17:39 AM »

This is great except for one thing...

Supposing the Anti-Christ does rise to power, making a law banning microchips wont do a bit of good because as the leader of The New World Order he or she will have the unlimited power to make new laws and also repeal old ones and basically do what he/she wants. Don't get me wrong, I am glad its being outlawed (and no, I'm not Republican) because its too damned creepy.

And although I am not Christian any more (or going by that "title") I don't think microchips will be the Mark of the Beast amusing it happens. I think it will be simply those who believe that the new leader is "the messiah" and anyone who doesn't worship him/her will be imprisoned or killed. Basically "the Mark" is a law that states that you must believe he/she is God, and if you don't the punishment is imprisonment/death.


What secret agenda with spirit do I have that invites the justification and rightness of my limitations?

Who am I today and what grand and glorious adventures will I have?
Level 4 Contributor
Gender: Female
Posts: 119

« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2011, 07:47:53 PM »

Wow, well written.  I have to say, though, as an ex-believer, that the whole idea of the anti-christ or the mark of the beast is sadly expounded to the point of ad nauseum.  Again, what a well-written article, but maybe choose a more relevant subject next time.  Men of God have been spreading his word (burning & hanging towns & families) & showing us the true meaning of "Christian Love" since ancient Rome.  They were persecuted, so they ran amok perscuting every other culture they came across in God's name.  I care not one whit about this cultish idea of the Mark of the Beast or anyone's interpretation of it.  Since Christendom has proven itself to be completely without merit, why should anyone worry about its "prophecies"?  The only "good" Christians these days are so far from the accepted fold that they're barely considered Christians.  Ask them about it & I'm sure you'll be regaled with tales of bravery & how radical "real" Christianity is.  What a bunch of excuse-makers they are.  Just see their nobility.

Shadow hide you, moon watch over you, night cloak you, peace keep you.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Copyright 2005-2012 | Atlanta Vampire Alliance | All Rights Reserved
Theme By Nesianstyles | Buttons By Andrea | Modified By Merticus